LEGO Blackout--A Brickfrenzy.com Creation
Saturday, September 1st, 2007 6:28PM CDT
Categories: Movie Related News, Toy NewsPosted by: Tigertrack Views: 44,599
Topic Options: View Discussion · Sign in or Join to reply
He's a creation of Brick Frenzy, who have a site of many different Lego creations.
Coming in at about 16 inches tall in robot mode, and approximately 2 feet in alt mode, Blackout is fully transformable, and modeled after the toy version.
You can see the Blackout gallery here.
I don't know about you, but it makes me want to pull out my LEGOs and start creating again.
News Search
Got Transformers News? Let us know here!
Most Popular Transformers News
Most Recent Transformers News
Posted by Lapse Of Reason on September 1st, 2007 @ 6:34pm CDT
Posted by one wing angel on September 1st, 2007 @ 6:34pm CDT
Posted by Tigertrack on September 1st, 2007 @ 6:45pm CDT
I wish I could do that!
Posted by mattyc1007 on September 1st, 2007 @ 6:57pm CDT
Posted by HighPrime on September 1st, 2007 @ 7:08pm CDT
Posted by tom brokaw on September 1st, 2007 @ 7:26pm CDT
Posted by kenshin_07 on September 1st, 2007 @ 7:27pm CDT
Hehe it'd be cool if there was a little scorponok to go with it!
I see what you mean about wanting to start building again too!
Posted by Dclone Soundwave on September 1st, 2007 @ 7:42pm CDT
Posted by InvaderJes on September 1st, 2007 @ 9:41pm CDT
Posted by 1337W422102 on September 1st, 2007 @ 9:59pm CDT
Posted by Cyber-Kun on September 1st, 2007 @ 10:17pm CDT
Posted by Autobot032 on September 1st, 2007 @ 10:44pm CDT
Posted by First-Aid on September 2nd, 2007 @ 12:50am CDT
1. Cool!
2. SOmeone has WAY too much time on their hands.
Posted by First-Aid on September 2nd, 2007 @ 12:51am CDT
Got a source on that? I've always used "legos" when referring to multiple Lego bricks. I wonder what Webster's has to say about it?1337W422102 wrote:The plural of Lego is 'Lego.' The word 'Lego' is like the word 'rice,' you can have a bowl of rice and you can have a bucket of Lego. You can have a single grain of rice and you can have a single Lego brick. But you cannot have rices, nor can you have Legos. Gaah!
Posted by Radical Ninja on September 2nd, 2007 @ 1:17am CDT
1337W422102 wrote:The plural of Lego is 'Lego.' The word 'Lego' is like the word 'rice,' you can have a bowl of rice and you can have a bucket of Lego. You can have a single grain of rice and you can have a single Lego brick. But you cannot have rices, nor can you have Legos. Gaah!
Actually, this isn't true, although it is a popular misconception.
I refer you to LEGO's 2004 Company Profile:
http://www.lego.com/info/pdf/compprofileeng.pdf
On the last page (16) of the document, it states:
- The LEGO brand name should always be written in capitals.
- The LEGO brand name must not be used generically - nor should it be used in the plural form or the possessive, e.g. "LEGO's".
- When the LEGO brand name is used as a noun, it must never stand alone. It must always be accompanied by another noun. For example, LEGO set, LEGO products, LEGO Company, LEGO play materials, LEGO bricks, LEGO universe, etc.
So technically, you can have neither a single LEGO nor multiple LEGO (or LEGOs). You can only have one LEGO brick or multiple LEGO bricks.
Posted by Autobot032 on September 2nd, 2007 @ 1:48am CDT
Radical Ninja wrote:1337W422102 wrote:The plural of Lego is 'Lego.' The word 'Lego' is like the word 'rice,' you can have a bowl of rice and you can have a bucket of Lego. You can have a single grain of rice and you can have a single Lego brick. But you cannot have rices, nor can you have Legos. Gaah!
Actually, this isn't true, although it is a popular misconception.
I refer you to LEGO's 2004 Company Profile:
http://www.lego.com/info/pdf/compprofileeng.pdf
On the last page (16) of the document, it states:- The LEGO brand name should always be written in capitals.
- The LEGO brand name must not be used generically - nor should it be used in the plural form or the possessive, e.g. "LEGO's".
- When the LEGO brand name is used as a noun, it must never stand alone. It must always be accompanied by another noun. For example, LEGO set, LEGO products, LEGO Company, LEGO play materials, LEGO bricks, LEGO universe, etc.
So technically, you can have neither a single LEGO nor multiple LEGO (or LEGOs). You can only have one LEGO brick or multiple LEGO bricks.
I always said Legos. Hmm. Learn something new everyday. Even if you don't want to.
Posted by Supreme Convoy on September 2nd, 2007 @ 3:49am CDT
Hopefully Hasbro releases more sophisticated Lego-esque line (unlike the BTR line) like this.
Posted by terc81 on September 2nd, 2007 @ 5:21am CDT
The closest transforming LEGO toy (in deference to the sub-thread on the proper use of the word LEGO ) I had that worked was the StarWars LEGO Technic Droideka, which had a lot of kibble and pales in comparison to this.
Makes me wonder what happened to the LEGO Escaflowne I also drooled over some time ago. Kudos to the Brickmasters!
Posted by Tigertrack on September 2nd, 2007 @ 6:16am CDT
terc81 wrote:It's just... 8-O 8-O 8-O 8-O 8-O
The closest transforming LEGO toy (in deference to the sub-thread on the proper use of the word LEGO ) I had that worked was the StarWars LEGO Technic Droideka, which had a lot of kibble and pales in comparison to this.
Makes me wonder what happened to the LEGO Escaflowne I also drooled over some time ago. Kudos to the Brickmasters!
Terc81 welcome! As you can plainly see Seibertron contains nuts of all sorts. Sorry that I misspelled the plural of LEGO apparently, but fear not, the site is a high quality place to hang out even if the news crew sometimes makes a spelling error. Enjoy the community, it's the best (and obviously smartest) around.
"Let the person without sin, cast the first stone..." in regards to spelling.
Posted by Liege Evilmus on September 2nd, 2007 @ 1:04pm CDT
Posted by Auto Bot on September 2nd, 2007 @ 1:39pm CDT
Posted by i_amtrunks on September 2nd, 2007 @ 7:57pm CDT
Love the fanmade lego-bots.
Posted by Bombus distinguendus on September 2nd, 2007 @ 8:56pm CDT
Posted by Fred2012 on September 3rd, 2007 @ 8:33am CDT
Posted by Nemesis Maximus on September 3rd, 2007 @ 9:05pm CDT
Posted by devil prime on September 4th, 2007 @ 11:02am CDT
Posted by Dinobot Prime on September 6th, 2007 @ 5:32pm CDT
But that is pretty flipping sweet. And way too big for me.