william-james88 wrote:TF-fan kev777 wrote:
I've never really understood the argument/sentiment that X character wasn't a headmaster before, so now Hasbro has ruined them.
I never got it either. Thats like saying G1 optimus was never a small cab that combined to become bigger so Power master prime ruins 84 Optimus.
william-james88 wrote:[
Or better yet, Optimus was never a senseless murderer so him killing leonard nemoy Sentinel Prime ruins Optimus. Or even better, Megatron was never a big skeleton looking organic robot so the movies ruin him. or even better, Galvatron was made by Unicron not humans so now the movies ruin him. To me Optimus is still cool, Megatron is still great and Galvatron is still **** awesome, the movie interpretations dont ruin anything. Just like these new toy interpretations dont ruin anything. And anyways, at this rate, the MP line will have these characters as non headmasters for all the fans to buy so I think we all win eventually.
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Sabrblade wrote:I keep bringing up this Geewhiner sentiment and its absurdity keeps reigning true:
If it's not EXACTLY like how it was in MY childhood, no matter how poorly done it might or might have not been, then it SUCKS!!!!!
And yet, those making "G1 with knees" complaints argue at the opposite end of the spectrum:
Everything MUST be UPDATED! I already HAVE the G1 toys! I don't WANT the SAME THING AGAIN but with KNEES added!!!!
Oy, this fandom.
bodrock wrote:As a fan who leans more Geewhiner-than-Beastmaster, all I care about is - is this figure a good take on the character?
I do compare them to the original, if I had them, though.....and personally, when I think of true G1, to me it means prior to the '86 movie!
But I digress....
My best guess is that the people making the "G1 with knees" complaints got so used to the updated design aesthetics that began with the 2006 Classics line that they've come to expect the CHUG toys to looks like the G1 characters in new, modern-looking, but still familiar-enough and appropriate bodies, instead of them looking like the same 198s G1 bodies but with modern articulation, which is more of an expectation of the Masterpiece line that is beholden to the 1980s G1 look, while CHUG lines are where aspects of newness and creativity can be more freely applied to new toys of G1 characters.phantom1592 wrote:The 'G1 with Knees' would be exactly what I wanted. I can't understand why people would have a problem with that??
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
RodimusRex wrote:The Headmasters didn't start out as Headmasters either. I personally like to imagine the Generations toys as a post-G1 continuation of G1.
This may explain why I like New Adventures He-Man and G2 so much. Or why I like Rodimus more than Optimus. Or why Rebirth is clicking for me at DC Comics. I like these characters like I like old friends and I like seeing them change and grow old, even when it means a bad haircut or a new paint job. The last thing I'd want is for them to stay exactly as I first encountered them or rebooted continuously into a cool, modern equivalent of that. I like them to evolve, grow, have bad phases. I guess I like the Japanese continuities more because they're more sequel than reboot.
william-james88 wrote:I am just glad we still have transformers toys today. So many toylines have died or diminished over the years.
nycPrime wrote:william-james88 wrote:I am just glad we still have transformers toys today. So many toylines have died or diminished over the years.
So I've actually been thinking about this recently. Do the Generations line sell very well?
I assume it must since Hasbro is still pumping out figures for it, and they're still occupying valuable shelf space at major retailers. But that's about the only reason I can think of it selling well.
RID and the movie toys I understand, it's based on current material that kids are excited to watch and want a related toy. From what I can gather, Generations is influenced by G1 and the current comics. I'm guessing a large percentage of folks buying this stuff are roughly in their 30s and loved the G1 show growing up (like myself), and another large group are those that follow the comics. For simplicity, I'm going to assume both groups are mutually exclusive, but they're probably not. In any case, I can't fathom both groups being large enough to drive sales numbers to justify the continuation of the line. Kids must also be buying this stuff, but how would they even know about this? A 10 year old that learned about Transformers from the Michael Bay movies and getting interested in Generations toys as a result seems a stretch to me.
The other thing is that in the past year and change I've been collecting, I've noticed a large number of figures eventually become heavily discounted or just shelf-warm. I've seen this more often than figures that are popular and hard to get. And sometimes figures that are hard to get are due to poor Hasbro distribution as opposed to them flying off the shelves.
So back to the original question: does Generations sell well, and if so, why? This is genuine curiosity on my part.
phantom1592 wrote:bodrock wrote:As a fan who leans more Geewhiner-than-Beastmaster, all I care about is - is this figure a good take on the character?
I do compare them to the original, if I had them, though.....and personally, when I think of true G1, to me it means prior to the '86 movie!
But I digress....
LOL! Yeah, I agree with that! For me, the movie kind of killed off transformers for me. Partly due to the fact that they outright murdered so many of my favorite characters... and partly because my stations didn't seem to carry season 3 when it came back. So I only saw Rodimus take over for Optimus... I never got to see him do any of the actual 'leading'.
The toys around that time? They started changing the core concept too much for me. once they started going from 'robots in disguise' to non-earth vehicles and Cyber-planes and stuff... i stopped getting them.
I first started with the toys... then The Marvel comics... then the cartoon. SO G1 means a lot of different things to a lot of different people. For me, those first 5-10 Marvel Comics were/are the core origins of the Transformers.
My collecting habits now? I love the original character designs. I HATED the original execution. Getting modern transformation tied in with the iconic character design... is my goal. The 'G1 with Knees' would be exactly what I wanted. I can't understand why people would have a problem with that?? Those original toys were... NOT great. The best of them were limited, the worst were bricks. That's what sold me on the new powermaster. Actual poseability.
But yeah, the 'fandom' is spread so wide, the hundreds of different goals people can have.
Sabrblade wrote: while CHUG lines are where aspects of newness and creativity can be more freely applied to new toys of G1 characters.
nycPrime wrote:william-james88 wrote:I am just glad we still have transformers toys today. So many toylines have died or diminished over the years.
So I've actually been thinking about this recently. Do the Generations line sell very well?
o.supreme wrote:Where I live most TF sections are dwindling.
nycPrime wrote:For many weeks over the summer they literally had a total of less than 10 figures, and the majority was RID. I'm hoping this is all just a blip, but it's been a while since I've seen a good selection of figures near me.
-Kanrabat- wrote:YEah, too many Transformers are in a serious need of a good rim job.
Blast Cannon wrote:This thread is brilliant. Duragrip you are a gloriously weird sexual deviant and I love it.
Emerje wrote:Just out of curiosity when was the last time a Transformer showed up in the USA first? Any line. I can't really think of anything off the top of my head, seems like things show up in places like things show up in Canada or Australia or even parts of Europe long before we start seeing them here. Not that there's anything really wrong with that, it's just funny how much things have changed in the past 10 years or so.
Emerje
Return to Transformers Toys Discussion
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Bumblevivisector, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], MSN [Bot], Rodimus Prime, Yahoo [Bot]